Both replace missing teeth. Here's how they actually compare — and when we'd recommend each.
| Traditional bridge | Dental implant | |
|---|---|---|
| Neighboring teeth | Ground down to anchor the bridge | Untouched |
| Bone preservation | Bone under the gap keeps shrinking | Stimulates and preserves bone |
| Lifespan | Typically 10–15 years | Designed to last decades |
| Cleaning | Special flossing under the bridge | Brush & floss normally |
| Timeline | Faster (weeks) | Months, including healing |
| Upfront cost | Usually lower | Higher initially, often cheaper long-term |
[DRAFT — Dr. Khuu to review.] For most healthy patients, an implant is the better long-term investment — it protects the neighboring teeth and the bone. But a bridge is sometimes the right call: when the neighboring teeth already need crowns, when timelines matter, or when surgery isn't advisable. We'll tell you which applies to you — and we place and restore both.
A bridge usually costs less upfront; an implant often costs less over a lifetime because bridges are typically replaced every 10–15 years. We'll price both for your case honestly.
Yes — an implant bridge replaces several missing teeth on two or more implants, without grinding down natural teeth.
A consultation with a 3D scan. Dr. Khuu will show you both options for your specific mouth, with all-in costs, and no pressure either way.
A free consultation with a 3D scan gets you a real answer and an honest, all-in quote — no pressure.